What the sexes owe one another

Marriage is a strange but curiosly persistent and widespread arrangement. How humanity arrived at it, whether by nature or by divine appointment, if there is any sense in making such a distinction from the perspective of the time, isnt really my concern here, and isn’t a question that can be empirically answered. It certainly seemsContinue reading “What the sexes owe one another”

The Jewish odyssey: historical, archetypal, or both? 

The description of God in the Bible always seems to run just ahead of the mode of being at the time. So that looking back from each rung upon which his followers reach, they see how what came before makes sense in the greater context. The world slowly opens up. Their mode of being slowlyContinue reading “The Jewish odyssey: historical, archetypal, or both? “

In what sense is religion true? 

It’s at least plausible to say that the Biblical stories are psychologically true. I think even great critics of Christianity would agree with many of the philosophical and psychological truths they contain. And it’s not clear that saying they’re psychologically true exhausts all the ways in which they might be true. They certainly get aContinue reading “In what sense is religion true? “

Jung and Thomas Sowell

I finally understand, I think, what the archetypes of Jung are. I was thinking of them too much like an English major. They’re like built in concepts hardwired into human psychology. They map onto oract as symbolic representations of something built into the human psyche. They reflect some deep seated conceptual framework or concept thatContinue reading “Jung and Thomas Sowell”

Choice, agency, and morality 

There’s this very odd argument I keep hearing about all kinds of things. It’s a moral explanatory argument. I’ve seen in used in many circumstances, about homosexuality, transexualism, race, economics. It’s a two stage argument. The first stage, typically left unsaid and assumed, is that people aren’t responsible for things they didn’t choose. Moral responsibilityContinue reading “Choice, agency, and morality “

Why does mimesis work?

The primary guideposts of moral opinions are not arguments but are social acceptability (convention) and exemplars. Both of which work similarly. They save work and rely on consensus of either the group or tan expert. This works because the essential content bearers of moral judgements are not ideas but instincts. People have instinctive value sets,Continue reading “Why does mimesis work?”

Would men care about women without sex? 

One thing I sometimes wonder is, what percentage of the love, attention, and respect that men show women is due to their sexual attraction to them? I’m willing to bet that it’s a lot. Looking at how men act toward men, there’s a lot of competition. There’s not a huge amount of personal interest. MenContinue reading “Would men care about women without sex? “

The greatest moral battlefield is our own heart 

There are many battles that must be fought in life, many challenges overcome, many difficulties to navigate. But anyone who tells you that the most significant moral struggle you will face in your life is with someone else is not telling you the truth. The nearest, most decisive, longest, most numerous and varied, and mostContinue reading “The greatest moral battlefield is our own heart “